Legal Opinion

Sechrist v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Finley, J., 26 May, 1921, from Guilfoed.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CubiaM.

This is a controversy without action, tried and decided below upon a case agreed, tbe following being the facts:

Plaintiff asked for an injunction to restrain defendants from issuing certain bonds and levying certain taxes for graded school purposes. The injunction was refused, .and plaintiff appealed.

The General Assembly of North Carolina, at its extra session in 1920, passed an act entitled “An act to establish a high school district of High Point Township, Guilford County, and to issue bonds with which to build and equip a high school building, and to provide for the payment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marshall v. SillimanIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Anderson v. . WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Felmet v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Starmount Co. v. Town of Hamilton LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Board of Education of Calloway Cty. v. TalbottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Fletcher v. . Comrs. of BuncombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Woosley v. Commissioners of Davidson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API