Legal Opinion

Rehberg v. Paulk

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 11, 2010No. 09-11897PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Before CARNES, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. HULL, Circuit Judge:

Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellee’s petition for rehearing and to the extent it seeks panel rehearing, we vacate the prior opinion in this case, issued on March 11, 2010 and published at 598 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir.2010), and substitute the following opinion in its place. PlaintiffAppellee’s petition for panel rehearing is granted in part and denied in part.

In this § 1983 action, Plaintiff Charles Rehberg sued former District Attorney Kenneth Hodges, specially appointed prosecutor Kelly…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Kwame Ajamu v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Grider v. City of Auburn, Ala.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Cindy Laine Franklin v. Chris CurryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API