Legal Opinion

United States v. Claudio Dibe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2015No. 13-50515PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILMAN, Circuit Judge:

In 2012, Claudio Uche Dibe pleaded guilty to 15 counts of wire fraud without reaching a plea agreement with the government. The district court sentenced him to 120 months in prison, which was below the appropriate U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range. Dibe now appeals on the ground that his sentence would have been even lower if the district court had considered Dibe’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim as a mitigating factor under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Underlying offense

F…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Claudio DibeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Darryl GenisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Mario VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API