Legal Opinion

United States v. Six Thousand Two Hundred Seven ($6,207) Dollars in United States Currency

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided September 24, 2010No. Case 2:08-cv-999-MEFPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARK E. FULLER, Chief Judge.

In this lawsuit brought pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), Plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) seeks forfeiture of six thousand two hundred seven dollars ($6,207) in United States currency (the “defendant money”). (Doc. # 1). The Government alleges that the defendant money, seized during the arrest of Sylvester Vaughn (“Vaughn”) for drug trafficking and distribution of a controlled substance, was furnished, or intended to be furnished, in exchange for controlled substances; represents proceeds of trafficking in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Four Million, Two Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand, Etc., United States of America v. Three Million, Six Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Montgomery v. VaughnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  2. United States v. $822,694.81 in United States Currency Seized From Account No. XXXXXXXX7424District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  3. United States v. One 2005 Dodge MagnumDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API