Legal Opinion

United States v. One 2005 Dodge Magnum

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 22, 2012No. Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-135-TCBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge.

This ease comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [11], Claimant Joanne Dallas (“Dallas”) opposes the motion,

*1363I. Background

As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that Dallas has not complied with the Court’s local rules. Specifically, she has failed to properly respond to each of the Government’s undisputed material facts as required by Local Rule 56.1(B)(2)(a)(l)-(3). As a result, those facts are deemed admitted. See Brandon v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Sys., 393 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1347-48 (N.D.Ga.2005); see also Jones v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. $38,000.00 in United States Currency, David English and Michael William English, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. A Single Family Residence And Real Property Located At 900 Rio Vista Blvd., Ft. LauderdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API