Rose v. United States

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion, made pursuant to Criminal Rule 118, to seal the records of his arrest in January 1999. Following an evi-dentiary hearing, the trial court concluded that appellant had not met his burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that he had not committed a crime, and thus was not entitled to relief under Rule 118. See Super. Ct.Crim. R. 118. Appellant contends that the trial judge erred in applying the wrong legal standard and in failing to consider the possibility that the assault, if committed, was in…