Legal Opinion

Howard v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 2009No. 08-CF-173PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Senior Judge:

Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it. On appeal from that conviction, he argues (1) that the trial court abridged his Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him by limiting his cross-examination of the police officers who executed a search warrant at his home, and (2) that the court abused its discretion by permitting testimony about an internal police finding that the use of force against appellant’s brother during the execution of the search warrant was justified. We reject the second argument but agree with the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. Marcus Patrele McKinleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. ALONZO R. VAUGHN and CARL S. MORTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Martinez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Melendez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Blades v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API