Legal Opinion
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Mueller
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 7, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Appellants assert that the question is novel and has not been previously decided in Wisconsin and they submit that the comparative-negligence statute (sec. 331.045) is available to them as a partial defense to the present action. That statute is:
“Comparative negligence; when bars recovery. Contributory negligence shall not bar recovery in an action by any person or his legal representative to recover damages for negligence resulting in death or in injury to person or property, if such negligence was not as great as the negligence of the person against whom recovery is sought, but any damages…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Verhelst Construction Co. v. GallesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. De BruinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. ShaftonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. SpewachekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Stolper v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. of Shelby v. Girard Steel Supply Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1963