Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. of Shelby v. Girard Steel Supply Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
This expression is occasioned by defendant’s motion for summary judgment or for dismissal on the several grounds set out in the footnote. 1
Jurisdiction is based on allegations of diversity and the requisite amount in controversy. The plaintiff is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business at Shelby, Ohio, and the defendant is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business at St. Paul, Minnesota.
It appears from the pleadings that on the 6th day of April, 1961, one Harold N. Stoffel, while riding as a passenger in an automobile being operated by…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Price v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986