Legal Opinion
Van Arsdale v. Clemo (In Re A.H. Robins Co.)
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 16, 1986No. 85-01307-RPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MERHIGE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to challenge, as unrepresentative, the members of the official Dai-kon Shield Claimants Committee. The motion has been fully briefed and argued and is ripe for disposition.
Background
Prior to the commencement of this reorganization proceeding an ad hoc committee of 38 attorneys, representing Daikon Shield claimants, was organized to promote the interests of the Daikon Shield claimants. On September 12, 1985, this group retained Murray Drabkin of Cadwalader, Wichers-ham & Taft (“C, W & T”) as its…
2Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In Re Business Information Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Van Arsdale v. ClemoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- In Re America West AirlinesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.