Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 1978No. 7718SC710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The crux of this appeal is respondents’ objection to the partition in kind of the land in question. Certain principles which guide the courts in deciding whether to order a sale of property owned by cotenants in lieu of an actual partition of the property are set out in Brown v. Boger, 263 N.C. 248, 255-257, 139 S.E. 2d 577, 582-583 (1965). Among those principles are the following: A tenant in common is entitled, as a matter of right, to a partition in kind if it can be accomplished equitably. That is to say, partition in kind is favored over sale of the land for division,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Stanback v. StanbackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Fisher v. . Toxaway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Fisher v. Toxaway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Partin v. DALTON PROPERTY ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Whatley v. WhatleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Donnell-Smith v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. Bomer v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API