Stanback v. Stanback
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
First, defendant contends the trial court committed error when it did not permit her “to offer full and complete evidence when the evidence she attempted to offer was both relevant and pertinent.” We find no merit in this contention.
Under this contention defendant argues that in presenting her case it was necessary that she bring out many pertinent facts relating to the background of the long controversy between her and plaintiff; that the trial court demonstrated “an attitude of haste and intolerance” with respect to permitting her to testify fully and offer all necessary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Greer v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Berry Brothers Corp. v. Adams-Millis Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re L.O.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Spencer v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- In re H.L.A.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- In re L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Leatherwood v. EhlingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.