Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Irvin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 2016No. 726 MDA 2015PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, P.J.E.:

David Scott Irvin (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of sentence entered after a jury convicted him of possession with intent to deliver (“PWID”), 1 possession of drug paraphernalia, 2 criminal conspiracy to unlawful delivery of a controlled substance, 3 and tampering with evidence. 4 Sentenced to an aggregate of 25 months’ to 12 years’ imprisonment, 5 Appellant challenges the denial of his motion to suppress and the sufficiency of the evidence offered at trial. We affirm.

Appellant’s arrest and convictions stem from evidence obtained during both a war-rantless…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. VargasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. RussoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. SweitzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Bayle, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Bell, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Blatch, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API