Harvey v. Metropolitan Utilities District
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This action was brought pursuant to the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act. Bobbie J. Harvey and Roberta H. Harvey asserted negligence on the part of Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha (MUD), relying on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. The Douglas County District Court found that MUD’s negligence was the proximate cause of explosions and a fire at the Harveys’ residence and that MUD’s negligence caused the Harveys’ loss of real and personal property. MUD appeals.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
A district court’s factual findings in a case brought under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Asher v. Coca Cola Bottling CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Brown v. Scrivner, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Daugherty v. Nebraska Natural Gas CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Mix v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McIntosh Ex Rel. McIntosh v. Omaha Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Roberts v. Weber & Sons, Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Chism v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Koch v. Norris Public Power DistrictNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
- Barker v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.