Legal Opinion

Brown v. Scrivner, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1992No. S-89-1395PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Kim C. Brown claims she was unexpectedly struck twice by an automatic door at a Scrivner, Inc.’s Food 4 Less grocery store in Lincoln. She claims she was injured. In her second amended petition for damages, Brown alleged that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied to her cause of action.

The district court for Lancaster County entered a summary judgment denying Brown relief and dismissing her lawsuit because “the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable to the undisputed facts in this case.”

We reverse the ruling of the district court and remand the cause for further proceedings.

“ ‘A…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rose v. Port of New York AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Johnston v. Grand Union Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Hisey v. Cashway Supermarkets, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Landmark Hotel & Casino, Inc. v. MooreNevada Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jerista v. MurraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Kmart Corp. v. BassettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Brewster v. United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Roberts v. Weber & Sons, Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Harvey v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API