Legal Opinion

Chism v. Campbell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1996No. S-94-1065PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Mary Chism brought this medical malpractice action based on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur against Allan S. Campbell, M.D.; Sandra Landmark, M.D.; and Midlands Community *923Hospital for injuries Chism allegedly suffered to her tooth as a result of having a surgical operation to remove her gallbladder. The district court for Sarpy County granted a summary judgment for each appellee, holding the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to be inapplicable. We conclude that given the underlying facts of this case, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable and there is no genuine issue as to any…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Perin v. HayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Tappe Ex Rel. Tappe v. Iowa Methodist Medical CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  4. Washa v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Torrison Ex Rel. Torrison v. OvermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Moore v. Eggers Consulting Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Darrah v. Bryan Memorial HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kramer v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Stones v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API