Legal Opinion

Crofton v. Bargreen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1958No. 34409Published

1Opinion of the Court

53 Wn.2d 243 (1958)

332 P.2d 1081

WILLIAM CROFTON et al., Respondents,

v.

HOWARD S. BARGREEN, Appellant.[1]

No. 34409.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

December 10, 1958.

Parker Williams and Edward J. Novack, for appellant.

Welts & Welts and Clarence J. Coleman, for respondents.

DONWORTH, J.

This action was brought by William Crofton and his son to recover the balance allegedly due under an option contained in a written partnership agreement which had been exercised by appellant. The trial court entered judgment for respondents in accordance with the prayer of the complaint, and…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Bellingham Securities Syndicate, Inc. v. Bellingham Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Boeing Airplane Co. v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API