Legal Opinion
Schellinger Brothers v. Cotter
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 2016No. A142201PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
—This is the third appeal involving a frustrated attempt by respondent Schellinger Brothers 1 to develop a large tract of real property in the City of Sebastopol (the City) it had agreed to purchase from appellant James F. Cotter. We opened our opinion in the second appeal with the following:
“In Schellinger Brothers v. City of Sebastopol (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 1245 [102 Cal.Rptr.3d 394] (Schellinger I), this court first encountered the controversy surrounding a proposed commercial development that had become ensnared in a bureaucratic and politically charged morass that saw…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cox v. Griffin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cox v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- In re: Edra D. BlixsethUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Murray v. Hull CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Performance Swing Stage, Inc. v. Coaction Specialty Insurance Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.