Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 12,973 Larry D. Waller v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. John Crane, Inc. Carlock, Inc. Celotex Corporation: And Carey-Canada, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1991No. 90-3259PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

This action seeks damages for personal injury suffered by Larry D. Waller allegedly as a result of his exposure to defendants’ asbestos products. The district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment upon concluding that the action was barred by the applicable Kansas statute of repose. See Waller v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 742 F.Supp. 581 (D.Kan.1990). As discussed briefly below, we are in substantial agreement with the analysis and authorities relied on by the district court, and we therefore affirm.

This case was originally filed in the United States…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Crisman v. Cooper Industries, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. Jackson v. American Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  4. Menne v. Celotex Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
  5. Waller v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harding v. K.C. Wall Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Olcott v. Delaware Flood Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. State of Minn. Ex Rel. Hove v. DoeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Commercial Financial Services, Inc. v. Temple (In Re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
  5. A.S.I., Inc. v. SandersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API