Legal Opinion

Rolater v. Strain

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 11, 1913No. 2801PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Ge'o. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Mattie Inez Strain against J. B. Rolater. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county, rendered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the defendant in error, and against the plaintiff in error, for $1,000, in an action for trespass to the person.

The plaintiff in error is a physician and surgeon, in Oklahoma City, and, at the time of the wrong charged, owned and was conducting a sanitarium at Fourth and Stiles streets. The defendant in error, a young lady, was in the employ of the Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Company, and on February 7, 1908, when passing from the building of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Pratt v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Rishworth v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Scott v. BradfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Davis v. HubbardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
  5. Woolley v. HendersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API