Legal Opinion
Bucholz v. City of Sioux Falls
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1958No. File 9645PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
This action was commenced by Albert Bucholz as special -administrator t© recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of' his .minor son. From a judgment on a verdict in the amount of $7,000, defendant city appeals.
The City of Sioux Falls had -some time prior to 195Ó constructed, and thereafter maintained, a pistol and rifle range in the basement of the city hall for the use of the members of its police force for target practice. On Monday evening, November 21, 1955, plaintiffs 16 year old son and four companions, ages fifteen to seventeen, with the permission of police officers, but…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Caldwell v. Village of Island ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Johnston v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- City of Chicago v. SebenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Gebhardt v. Village of Lagrange ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Nugent v. QuamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Conway v. HumbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Westover v. East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Sioux Falls Construction Co. v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.