Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. McManus
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment granted to Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. The trial court held Fidelity had no duty to defend the insured, James Richard McManus, in a suit alleging negligent entrustment. The Houston [1st Dist.] Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court judgment and rendered judgment that Fidelity had a duty to defend the insured. 615 S.W.2d 877. We reverse the court of civil appeals judgment.
Harold McManus purchased a trail bike for his son James. James allowed his friend, Craig Wooley, to use the bike. While using the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Mundy v. Pirie-Slaughter Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
- Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. NoelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Barnstable County Mutual Fire Insurance v. LallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Republic Vanguard Insurance Co. v. BuehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- King v. Dallas Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Lincoln General Ins. v. ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.