Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. McManus

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1982No. C-438PublishedCited by 163 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment granted to Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. The trial court held Fidelity had no duty to defend the insured, James Richard McManus, in a suit alleging negligent entrustment. The Houston [1st Dist.] Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court judgment and rendered judgment that Fidelity had a duty to defend the insured. 615 S.W.2d 877. We reverse the court of civil appeals judgment.

Harold McManus purchased a trail bike for his son James. James allowed his friend, Craig Wooley, to use the bike. While using the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mundy v. Pirie-Slaughter Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. NoelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Barnstable County Mutual Fire Insurance v. LallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Republic Vanguard Insurance Co. v. BuehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. King v. Dallas Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lincoln General Ins. v. ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API