Legal Opinion
Said v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 9, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1289PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
Currently pending before the Court is the plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Her Complaint Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Mot.”), which the defendant opposes,' Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration (“Opp’n”). Upon careful consideration of the parties’ submissions, 1 the Court will deny the motion, there being no reason to reverse its earlier rulings.
Although the plaintiff moves for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc. v. Guest Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Howard Greene v. Union Mutual Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Estate of Gaither Ex Rel. Gaither v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- In Defense of Animals v. National Institutes of HealthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Said v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Said v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019