Legal Opinion

Said v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 18, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2015-1289Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) CHERYL RENEE SAID, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-1289 (RBW) ) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER ) CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, Cheryl Renee Said, initiated this civil action against the defendant, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e- 17 (2012), the Civil Rights Act of 1866, as…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API