Pictorial Printing Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtAlschuler, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Coneededly the right to take proceedings for the determination, assessment, and collection of appellant’s 1916 tax terminated February 28, 1922, and when, a year and a half thereafter, the revenue officers appeared at appellant’s place of business to investigate that return, there was no longer any right to institute any proceedings looking to the determination, levy, or collection of any further tax for that year.
When the revenue officer then presented the waiver or consent for signature, the taxpayer had no liability on account of the tax for 1916; and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Joy Floral Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Columbian Iron Works v. BrockDistrict Court, D. Tennessee · 1929
- Spear & Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by14 opinions
- Staten Island Hygeia Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Richard R. Stenclik and Dolores Stenclik v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Panther Rubber Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- United States v. Southern Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Ambassador Hotel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.