Legal Opinion

Joy Floral Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 3, 1928No. 4690PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The decision involved in this appeal is reported at 7 B. T. A. 800. The facts in the ease are undisputed, and present but a single well-defined question of law.

The taxes in controversy are for the fiscal year ending July 31,1919, and accrued under the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1057). The taxpayer’s return was made on October 15, 1919, and the deficiency assessment in question was not made until July 15, 1925. The taxpayer contends that the Commissioner possessed no lawful authority to make the assessment after the lapse of five years after the filing of the return,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alexander v. Mayor of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1809

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. Jaffee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Trustees for Ohio & Big Sandy Coal Co. v. Com'r of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  4. WP Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. Santa Monica Mountain Park Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API