Legal Opinion

Richard R. Stenclik and Dolores Stenclik v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 26, 1990No. 1408, Docket 90-4021PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal comes to us from a ruling by the United States Tax Court (Lawrence A. Wright, Judge) that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) was not time-barred from assessing in 1988 a deficiency in 1980 federal income taxes due from Richard R. and Dolores Stenclik (“taxpayers”). The sole issue before us is the timeliness of the statutory notice of the 1980 income tax deficiency that was sent to taxpayers in June, 1988. The taxpayers’ primary argument is that, although they agreed to an open-ended extension of the limitations period in 1983, that period nonetheless…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pursell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  2. McManus v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  3. Greylock Mills v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. McManus v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Estate of Camara v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  2. DeSantis v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. United States v. Barry J. HodgekinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Robert M. St. John, Margaret E. St. John v. United States of America, Robert M. St. John, Margaret E. St. John v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Silverman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API