Legal Opinion

Kaehly v. City of Pittsburgh

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1997No. CIV. A. 96-832PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BLOCH, District Judge.

Presently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the Court will grant defendants’ motion and deny plaintiffs’ motion.

I. Background '

Each of the plaintiffs were issued a vending license which expired on or about January 31,1996, by defendant City of Pittsburgh (City) pursuant to City of Pittsburgh Ordinance No. 719 (Ordinance No. 719). In December 1995, defendant City amended Ordinance No. 719 effective December 15, 1995, to, inter alia, prohibit vending on or within thirty feet of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montanye v. Wissahickon School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Magoni-Detwiler v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. WILLIAMS v. SORBERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API