Scott v. Napolitano
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and Plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. General Employment History
In 1991, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lee v. City of Columbus, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Velma Bates v. Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Miller v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- Ellis A. Archerda v. Department of Defense, Merit Systems Protection Board2014
- Ellis A. Archerda v. Department of Defense, Merit Systems Protection Board2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.