Legal Opinion
Miller v. Whirlpool Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 12, 2011No. 3:10CV00473PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.
This is a civil suit involving plaintiff Roger Miller’s (Miller) claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343. Pending is plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. 17] and defendant Whirlpool Corporation’s (Whirlpool) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. 19]. For the reasons that follow, both motions will be denied.
Background
Miller worked for Whirlpool as a toolmaker from January 15, 2001, until his discharge on February 15, 2009. As part of his duties, Miller…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cripe v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City of Columbus, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hall v. Crawford Cty. Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Floyd v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- King v. Lazer Spot Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024