Legal Opinion

Cassatt v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 22, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctieiam.

The suit is brought to recover the purchase price of stock alleged to have been purchased by the defendant from the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are a partnership whose principal office is in the city of Philadelphia and one of whom resides in the city of Camden. The defendant is a national banking association with its place of business in West New York, Hudson county, New Jersey. The suit was instituted in the Supreme Court and the venue laid in Camden county. The-rule is to show cause why the venue should not be changed to some other county. The prosecutor contends, first, that a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crocker v. Marine National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Stewart v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Langdeau v. Republic National Bank of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Burns v. Northwestern National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Monarch Wine Co. v. ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API