Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Exxon Research and Engineering Company
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 5, 1975No. Civ. A. 681-70PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STERN, District Judge.
This action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), Title 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., was commenced as Dr. Dilworth T. Rogers v. Esso Research and Engineering Company. After his death, Dr. Rogers’ wife and daughter were named co-executrices of his estate on June 11, 1973, and were substituted as plaintiffs. The caption was amended to reflect the defendant’s corporate name change on June 14, 1974.
Trial with a jury was moved before this Court on January 14, 1975. There was no dispute that defendant Exxon had forced Dr. Rogers to take…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Andrew P. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Miguel VAZQUEZ Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Harry L. SLATIN, Appellee, v. STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.