Legal Opinion

Adams v. Cohen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action of contract brought to recover damages for refusal by the defendant to accept certain shoes *18manufactured for him by the plaintiff. There was evidence tending to show that the plaintiff was a manufacturer of men’s shoes, that he sold shoes upon orders first obtained by him but that the most important part of his business was not selling shoes after manufacture, that the defendant ordered of him one hundred dozen of “brag. oxford” shoes, that those ordered were “a fancy shoe” and harder to get “through the works than . . . a plain shoe,” that the shoes ordered by the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goddard v. BinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sidney Stevens Implement Co. v. HintzeUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. M. K. Smith Corp. v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Pope v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Brooks v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Rosen v. GarstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API