Legal Opinion

Pope v. Brooks

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 28, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The first count of the declaration alleges, that the parties entered into two contracts dated, respectively, February 12, 1920, and March 1, 1920, whereby the plaintiffs agreed to procure, and the defendants, who were wholesale dealers and importers, agreed to take and pay for a quantity of ninety line and sixty line rugs of various sizes and designs as shown by samples, which were to be made in China for the plaintiffs, who were to pay all import duties. Delivery under the contract for the' ninety line rugs was to be six months from February 12, 1920. While it was conceded that by a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barrie v. QuinbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Goddard v. BinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Williams v. GoochCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1861
  4. King v. FaistMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Automatic Time Table Advertising Co. v. Automatic Time Table Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pacheco v. MedeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Town of Saugus v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. M. K. Smith Corp. v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API