Legal Opinion

Guy B. Barham Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 10, 1968No. P68/203; protests 63/6678, 63/8684, and 63/18822 (Los Angeles)Published

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rattancore coolie hat planters, sleighs, modern shaped trays, serving trays, snack trays, and hanging planters similar in all material respects to those the subject of Royal Cathay Trading Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. et al. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 371, C.D. 2662); that the items of merchandise marked “C” consist of rattancore and reed Kleenex tissue box covers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Quon Quon Company v. United States (41 Cust.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Royal Cathay Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Quon Quon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Royal Cathay Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Quon Quon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API