Quon Quon Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Moulison, Judge:
The protests enumerated in the attached schedule were consolidated for trial. They cover numerous different items, all but one (item 2324) of which have in common that they were assessed with duty under the provision in paragraph 411 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “baskets * * * wholly or in chief value of * * * wood” at either 50 or 42% per centum ad valorem, depending upon the date of entry for consumption, the latter rate being applicable to merchandise entered for consumption after June 30,1958, under the modification of paragraph 411 contained in T.D. 54108. Various claims…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Quon Quon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- United States v. Byrnes & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Royal Cathay Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Royal Cathay Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- H.J. Stotter, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- International Artware Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- America Asia Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- America-Asia Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.