Legal Opinion

Inline, Inc. v. Apace Moving Systems, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 2005No. G031864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

Inline, Inc. and RGB Systems, Inc. (collectively Inline) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment determining as a matter of law that Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (Shurgard), a self-storage facility, conducted a lien auction of stored goods in a commercially reasonable manner. Inline also challenges the court’s $20 ceiling on restitution against Apace Moving Systems, Inc. (Apace) for a warehouseman’s lien auction deemed commercially unreasonable after a bench trial. We affirm both aspects of the judgment. Specifically, in the published portion of this opinion, we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foran v. Ulthera, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. Long Beach Memorial Medical etc. v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Long Beach Memorial Medical etc. v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Turner v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API