Inline, Inc. v. Apace Moving Systems, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
Inline, Inc. and RGB Systems, Inc. (collectively Inline) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment determining as a matter of law that Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (Shurgard), a self-storage facility, conducted a lien auction of stored goods in a commercially reasonable manner. Inline also challenges the court’s $20 ceiling on restitution against Apace Moving Systems, Inc. (Apace) for a warehouseman’s lien auction deemed commercially unreasonable after a bench trial. We affirm both aspects of the judgment. Specifically, in the published portion of this opinion, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foran v. Ulthera, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Long Beach Memorial Medical etc. v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Long Beach Memorial Medical etc. v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Turner v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022