Legal Opinion

Paul v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1932No. 28,959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The action is brought to recover $163.58, being the amount of a draft purchased by plaintiff from the defendant bank on September 26, 1930, on which payment had been refused by the bank upon which the draft was drawn. On September 26, 1930, the plaintiff came to the defendant bank and presented to the assistant cashier certain checks from a number of concerns, payable to plaintiff, amounting in all to $172 and some cents. He informed the cashier that he wanted to send a remittance or draft to the Federal Land Bank at St.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The People v. . Merchants and Mechanics' Bk.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Harrison v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Grammel v. CarmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Clark v. Toronto BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doty v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Paine v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Smith v. ZemurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  4. Polotsky v. Artisans Savings BankSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API