Legal Opinion

Smith v. Zemurray

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1934No. 7153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Another effort to escape the inexorable equality of distribution among creditors of failed banks, by asserting that the claimant is not a creditor hut a beneficial owner of a fund held in trust, this case grounds the claim of preference on constructive fraud.

Appellee, holding a dishonored New York draft for $5,000 issued to him before it closed by the failed bank, claiming that the circumstances of its issuance raised a trust in his favor, brought this suit to recover that amount as his funds in the possession of the receiver. The District Judge thought he made his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Blakey v. BrinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Cochrane v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Amos v. BairdSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of St. Petersburg v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Aetna Life & Casualty Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
  3. Jameson v. First Savings Bank & Trust Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API