Legal Opinion

Grammel v. Carmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1884PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Ingham. (Gridley, J.) Petition for order on receiver of insolvent estate. The receiver appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

The facts in this case are the following:

On May 15, 1883, Eugene Angelí was doing business as a private banker in Lansing, Michigan. His New York correspondent was the Chase National Bank. On the day named Grammel, the petitioner in this case, purchased of Angelí two small drafts on the Chase National Bank, amounting together to $174.50, and paid for them. They were ordinary *202bankers’ drafts, payable at sight. Angelí at this time was insolvent, though it was not publicly known, and two days thereafter he made a general assignment of his property for the benefit of all his creditors. Arthur N.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mandeville v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Marine Bank v. Fulton BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Risley v. . Phenix Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pullen v. Placer Country BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Gellert v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  5. Chetopa State Bank v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API