Legal Opinion
City of Middlesboro Planning Commission v. Howard
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Justice.
The issue on this appeal is the validity of a city of Middlesboro zoning ordinance. Section 75.25(C) of the ordinance provides:
“(C) Termination:
“Any one of the following acts or conditions shall terminate immediately the right to operate a nonconforming use:(1) Changing to a conforming use.(2) Abandonment.(3) Failure to obtain privilege license for a period of twelve months.(4) Non-operation or non-use for a period of twelve or more consecutive calendar months.”
In 1966, the city of Middlesboro enacted an ordinance providing for “Privilege Licenses” applicable to businesses…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Gates v. Jarvis, Cornette & PaytonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- Waikiki Marketplace Investment Co. v. Chair of Zoning Board of AppealsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Dembo, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Martin v. BeehanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
- Dempsey v. Newport Board of AdjustmentsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. LeiszIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997