Legal Opinion

City of Middlesboro Planning Commission v. Howard

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Justice.

The issue on this appeal is the validity of a city of Middlesboro zoning ordinance. Section 75.25(C) of the ordinance provides:

“(C) Termination:
“Any one of the following acts or conditions shall terminate immediately the right to operate a nonconforming use:(1) Changing to a conforming use.(2) Abandonment.(3) Failure to obtain privilege license for a period of twelve months.(4) Non-operation or non-use for a period of twelve or more consecutive calendar months.”

In 1966, the city of Middlesboro enacted an ordinance providing for “Privilege Licenses” applicable to businesses…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Gates v. Jarvis, Cornette & PaytonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waikiki Marketplace Investment Co. v. Chair of Zoning Board of AppealsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. Dembo, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Martin v. BeehanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
  4. Dempsey v. Newport Board of AdjustmentsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
  5. Board of Zoning Appeals v. LeiszIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API