Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Sturman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1963No. 9230PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

The plaintiff (respondent) brought this action to recover from defendants (appellants) upon the following promissory note:

“$ 1,000 December 24 19 58

One year after date, without grace, _I_ promise to pay to the order of Claude H. or Cora C. Sturman One thousand Dollars in lawful money of the United States of America, of the present standard value, with interest thereon, in like lawful money, at the rate of. 5% percent per annum from Jan. 1, 1959 until paid, for value received. Interest to be paid at maturity and if not so paid the whole sum of both principal and interest to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fies v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Kane v. EastmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Spencer v. HalpernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  4. In Re Estate of FeldmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Prichard v. StrikeUtah Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Bank of VirginiaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1982
  2. Financial Management Task Force, Inc. v. AltbergerColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Blackstone Valley National Bank v. WrightMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API