Bradford v. Sturman
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
The plaintiff (respondent) brought this action to recover from defendants (appellants) upon the following promissory note:
“$ 1,000 December 24 19 58
One year after date, without grace, _I_ promise to pay to the order of Claude H. or Cora C. Sturman One thousand Dollars in lawful money of the United States of America, of the present standard value, with interest thereon, in like lawful money, at the rate of. 5% percent per annum from Jan. 1, 1959 until paid, for value received. Interest to be paid at maturity and if not so paid the whole sum of both principal and interest to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fies v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Kane v. EastmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Spencer v. HalpernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- In Re Estate of FeldmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Prichard v. StrikeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Bank of VirginiaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1982
- Financial Management Task Force, Inc. v. AltbergerColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Blackstone Valley National Bank v. WrightMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975