Legal Opinion

Quarantillo v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 7, 1985No. Civ-84-72EPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ELFVIN, District Judge.

In this action under the Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., plaintiff has moved for a protective order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. rule 26(c) which either would preclude defendant from taking the deposition of a neurologist who has treated plaintiff for back injuries over the last fourteen years or would place limitations upon the scope of such examination. Plaintiff has asserted that this physician, Dr. Yu, will testify at trial as an expert witness for him and therefore that defendant is not entitled to discern facts known or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nelco Corp. v. Slater Electric Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Patel v. GayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Lamere v. New York State Office for the AgingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
  5. Peters v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API