Legal Opinion
Rando v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1960No. Civ. No. 17125PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAYFIEL, District Judge.. The third-party defendant, H. Muehl-stein & Co. Inc., hereinafter referred to as Muehlstein, moves, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the third-party complaint heretofore served upon it by the defendant, Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Luckenbach.
The actions brought against Lucken-baeh resulted from a fire and explosion which destroyed its pier at the foot of 35th Street, in Brooklyn, New York, on December 3, 1956.
Muehlstein contends that the third-party complaint is insufficient in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Inman v. Binghamton Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Putvin v. Buffalo Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Johnson v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Anderson v. Liberty Fast Freight Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. Coast Manufacturing & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Yanick v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961