Hooper v. Emery
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
The case came before tlie Court oil a statement of facts, which sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court. There was a brief argument by
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was drawn up, and delivered the week following, at the adjourned term in Cumberland, by
Shepley J.
This is an action of assumpsit, brought to recover a sum of money alleged to be due from the defendants to the plaintiff. The facts are agreed; and from the agreement of the parties it appears, that at a legal meeting of the inhabitants of the town of Biddeford, qualified to vote in town affairs, on the fourth day of April, 1837, a vote was passed to receive the money ápportioned to the'town under the act of the eighth of March, 1837, c. 265, entitled “ An act providing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stetson v. KemptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Dillingham v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Inhabitants of Worcester v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. City of New Richmond v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Bettey v. City of SidneyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Russell v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Grabe v. Lamro Independent Consolidated School District, No. 20South Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.