Legal Opinion

Amabello v. Colonial Motors

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 21, 1980No. 79-454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, C.J.

In this twice-tried case, the issues are whether the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence, instructing the jury on determining damages and imposing the costs of transcription upon the defendant. We find no error below and affirm.

The rather lengthy history of this case, is set out in Amabello v. Colonial Motors, 117 N.H. 556, 374 A.2d 1182 (1977), and so need not be repeated here. Suffice it to say that pursuant to our disposition there, the case was retried in June 1978 before Keller, C.J., sitting with a jury. Following five days of trial, the jury returned a verdict in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Amabello v. Colonial MotorsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. McLaughlin v. Union-Leader Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
  3. Sperl v. SperlSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Cyr v. SanbornSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
  5. Medico v. AlmasySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cutter v. Town of FarmingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Fortin v. Manchester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API