Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. Union-Leader Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 29, 1956No. 4527PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The defendant’s contention in support of its motion for a new trial is based on its claim that it did not have an impartial trial and was therefore deprived of the due process and equal protection of the laws guaranteed by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This argument cannot be accepted. The record of the previous transfer to this court (McLaughlin v. Union-Leader, 99 N. H. 492) discloses that by its motion for a mistrial and to set aside the verdict the defendant raised the same issues under the state Constitution relative to an impartial trial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Stearns v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stopford v. Boonton Molding Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Citizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Baker v. Dennis Brown RealtySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Estate v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Atlas Truck Leasing, Inc. v. First Nh Banks, Inc. (Formerly First Bancorp of New Hampshire, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.