Legal Opinion

Medico v. Almasy

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 31, 1967No. 5648PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

RSA 525:1 provides that “Costs shall follow the event of every action or petition, unless otherwise directed by law or by the court.” This section, together with RSA 525:3 gives the Superior Court discretion with respect to the allowance of costs. Averill v. Mathes, 55 N. H. 617; Hatch v. Rideout, 96 N. H. 122. RSA 502-A:30 provides with respect to civil actions in district courts that “Travel and attendance of parties and other costs and fees shall be allowed as in the superior court . . . .” This section by implication gives the district courts the same discretion as the Superior Court has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hatch v. RideoutSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
  2. Mudgett v. MelvinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890
  3. Averill v. MathesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875
  4. Preston v. CutterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cutter v. Town of FarmingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Tasker v. New Hampshire Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. Tau Chapter of Alpha Xi Delta Fraternity v. Town of DurhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Vezina v. Amoskeag Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API