Legal Opinion

City of Tukwila v. Garrett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2008No. 81067-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

¶1 — The defendant maintains that pursuant to RCW 2.36.050 jury pools for trials in Tukwila Municipal Court must be composed of persons residing within the city limits of Tukwila. Because the jury pool from which his jury was drawn was not, he contends that the jury pool was selected in violation of the statute. The trial court rejected the defendant’s argument, but the superior court agreed and reversed his conviction.

¶2 The purpose of article I, section 22 of the Washington State Constitution is to guarantee a fair and random selection of jurors from the county in which a crime is alleged…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Bothell v. BarnhartWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. City of Bothell v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. City of Bothell v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State Of Washington v. Isaiah M. KalebuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API