Derby Savings Bank v. Oliwa
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
The defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment reforming his mortgage deed and granting strict foreclosure. The record discloses that on March 30, 1988, the defendant executed a mortgage *603deed and note to the plaintiff. Due to a mistake, the mortgage deed contained a description of the wrong property. The trial court granted reformation of the mortgage deed so that it described the property that the parties had intended it to cover. Thereafter, the trial court granted strict foreclosure of the reformed mortgage. The defendant claims that the trial court abused its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Harlach v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Patalano v. ChabotSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Nevers v. Van ZuilenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richards v. RichardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Traggis v. Shawmut Bank Connecticut, N.A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Afscme, Council 4, Local 1566 v. Milford, No. Cv01-0073138s (Dec. 16, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Detullio v. Chebrah Bikur Cholim, Inc., No. Cv96 033 48 92 S (Apr. 7, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.